HomeStaying Afloat Report '24ResourcesAcknowledgements

Staying Afloat: Charting a Path to Longevity for Libraries of Things

Summary

Can you build a boat with your library card? Can you borrow a compass?

Libraries in the United States have consistently expanded their roles to fulfill their need for meaning in society. These institutions, which started off as private repositories of information, focused on assisting and assimilating the masses then moved to being a “cultural concern of the middle classes” (Söderholm & Nolin, 2015, p. 245), are again wrestled with the opportunity of redefinition. Can they answer yes to questions above? Some libraries are meeting needs by introducing innovative models for thing-lending, also known as Library of Things (LoT).

LoT collections have re-emerged as a strategy that many public libraries use to adapt to the ever changing needs of their communities. Yet there is little generalizable information existing on these collections and how they are managed long-term, despite existing in the U.S. since at least the 1930's. Our research team instead focused on identifying attributes and trends in LoTs that may establish guidance to successful long-term operation.

Participant enthusiasm in our work led us to seek out an efficient way to share the results of our research. In addition to our paper, we decided to create a website to share research and resources that we collected throughout the project, such as collection manuals. Additionally, we identified the need for tools to assist libraries in carrying out program evaluation and improvement strategies. Our hope is that by sharing our findings, others will be inspired to conduct further research on these collections and more public libraries will consider establishing a Library of Things collection.

In concluding our research we found that two distinct fleets of collections launched 1-5 and 5-10 years ago, while the We hope this research assists those with newer collections weather the waves as they, so creatively, seek the next shore.

pixelated lifesaver

Findings Brief


Our methodology for requesting participation was impacted by the limited time frame and what libraries were relevant to sample. Our criteria for potential libraries was informed by desk research and knowledge of known institutions with LoTs. We determined a mixed methods approach in order to triangulate several types of qualitative and quantitative data. We contacted 74 US libraries via their website contact forms, public email addresses, or phone calls. Our data collection was timeboxed to 7 days, and we completed a total of 7 interviews, 2 observations, 20 Instagram profile analyses and received 52 survey responses (a 70% response rate).

summary of data collection methods

Our research determined that community input, space constraints, labor shortages, and public funding are the main influencing factors to collection development, circulation, and engagement in US public LoTs. Item diversity, experimentation, and adaptability of collections, as well as interorganizational collaboration and promotional caution were identified as prominent and important aspects for currently operating LoTs, regardless of age.




To Read More, Download the Full "Staying Afloat '24 Report" treasure chest button

pixelated sailboat